Skip to content

Product Independently confirmed2 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

Revolut handed over passport scans to fraudulent requests sent from a real government domain

Revolut says an impersonation scam used a legitimate government agency domain to ask for customer records, and the fix it has described is blocking one email address. It has not said how many customers were affected.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • A Revolut spokesperson said a "limited" number of customers were affected and had been contacted directly, and the company declined to give a figure or name the agency whose domain was used.
  • Revolut said it blocked the email address, alerted the agency, law enforcement and regulators, and that its systems and customer funds are unaffected.
  • Crypto security researcher ZachXBT published Revolut's customer notice late on Friday and said the incident appeared to have been targeted at high net worth users.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure Affected customers carry this one indefinitely. An address or a phone number can be changed, and a passport image already delivered to a stranger, alongside the selfie taken to verify it, cannot be recalled or reissued.
  • What it limits constraint The only control Revolut has described operates on a single sender. Any team that treats a genuine agency domain as proof of identity is in the position it was in last week.
  • Who has to decide decision Every firm with a legal request inbox now has to pick a verification standard it can defend to a regulator, because Revolut's own account puts the failure in the check on the requester.
  • What it sets up precedent Revolut goes into its US national bank build-out with this case in the public record while the OCC approval is still conditional.

A request for customer records arrived from a government agency's real email domain, and Revolut answered it. The company's account of what happened is one sentence. "Revolut recently identified a sophisticated external impersonation scam where an unauthorised third party utilised a legitimate government agency domain email to submit fraudulent requests for information," the spokesperson said [5]. Revolut did not say whether the agency's mailbox was compromised or the address was spoofed [13].

The remedy on the record is address-level. Revolut said it blocked the email address, alerted the relevant government agency, law enforcement and relevant regulators, and that "Revolut systems and customer funds are unaffected" [6]. All of that can be true and still leave the person who staffs a legal request queue on Monday with nothing new to work with.

The notification to customers, which TechCrunch reviewed, lists birth dates, postal and email addresses, phone numbers, and copies of identity documents including passports and driver's licenses [2]. Revolut said the data may also have included verification selfies, account statements and transaction histories [3]. A phone number can be changed in an afternoon. A passport image sitting next to the selfie taken to verify it is the exact bundle someone needs to pass as that customer somewhere else. ZachXBT, the crypto security researcher who published Revolut's customer email late on Friday, said the incident appeared to have been targeted at high net worth users [8].

"Limited" is the only quantity Revolut has attached to the incident [4], set against more than 80 million customers and bank operations in more than 30 countries [7]. If the targeting ZachXBT described holds up, the selection matters more than the size: a handful of deliberately chosen wealthy account holders is a worse outcome than a random sample of the same count.

Teams tell themselves an inbound request has been verified because it came in on an official channel. A sender domain proves the sender controlled a mailbox at that domain. A more useful sort for a request desk runs on two axes: whether the requester was confirmed on a route they did not choose, and whether the data being released can be reissued. Passwords and account numbers can be. Passport scans, verification selfies and transaction histories cannot. Anything in the second group should not move on a sender domain alone. The control is a callback to a number the agency itself publishes: it costs turnaround time in the queue, and it takes the decision off whichever reviewer happens to open the email.

Revolut received conditional approval from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency earlier this month to set up a national bank, which it expects to launch in the first half of 2027 [11]. It is also reported to be weighing a listing that could value it at as much as $200 billion, against the $75 billion private valuation it carried in November [9], roughly 2.7 times the November figure [12].

What to watch

  • Whether the government agency whose domain was used is identified, and whether other banks report requests from the same address.
  • Whether a regulator opens a formal inquiry that forces Revolut to publish a count of affected customers.
  • Whether the OCC's conditions on Revolut's national bank approval touch how it authenticates law-enforcement and agency data requests.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+10
Incentives60
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Revolut confirmed that it disclosed sensitive customer information to an unauthorized third party after receiving fraudulent requests sent from a legitimate government agency email domain.

    Reported Supported Source: TechCrunchView cited source
  2. [2]

    The exposed data included customers' identity and contact details, including birth date, postal and email addresses and phone numbers, as well as copies of identity documents including passports and driver's licenses, according to a notification emailed to affected customers and reviewed by TechCrunch.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The data may also have included verification selfies, account statements and transaction histories, Revolut said in its notification.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    A Revolut spokesperson confirmed to TechCrunch that a "limited" number of customers were impacted and said the company had contacted those customers directly; Revolut did not disclose the exact number of impacted individuals, did not answer whether the incident was limited to a specific market, and declined to disclose the government agency involved.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    "Revolut recently identified a sophisticated external impersonation scam where an unauthorised third party utilised a legitimate government agency domain email to submit fraudulent requests for information," the Revolut spokesperson said.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    Revolut told TechCrunch that it blocked the email address after discovering the scam and alerted the relevant government agency, law enforcement and relevant regulators, adding, "Revolut systems and customer funds are unaffected."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    London-based Revolut has more than 80 million customers globally and operates as a bank in more than 30 countries, per its website.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  8. [8]

    Crypto security researcher ZachXBT posted about Revolut's email to affected customers late on Friday and said the incident appeared to have been targeted at high net worth users.

    Reported Supported Source: ZachXBT, via TechCrunchView cited source
  9. [9]

    Revolut reportedly weighs a potential public listing that could value it at as much as $200 billion, up from its $75 billion private valuation in November.

    Reported Supported Source: reported, per TechCrunchView cited source
  10. [10]

    Revolut recently expanded its presence in markets including India, Mexico, France and the UAE, and secured banking licenses in France and the UK in recent months.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    Earlier this month the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency granted conditional approval to Revolut to set up a national bank in the country, which the firm expects to launch in the first half of 2027.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    The reported potential listing valuation of $200 billion is about 2.7 times Revolut's $75 billion private valuation in November.

    Derived Supported
  13. [13]

    Revolut's statement describes an unauthorised third party using a legitimate government agency domain email but does not state whether the agency mailbox was compromised or the address spoofed.

    Derived Supported

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. techcrunch.com

    1 article · September 12, 2026

    Revolut confirms customer data breach through fake government requests
  2. thenextweb.com

    1 article · September 13, 2026

    Revolut handed customer passports to scammers using a real government email domain

Topics and entities