Skip to content

Security Independently confirmed2 publishers 2 min read Published Updated

iRhythm notifies at least 360,000 patients after a social engineering breach of hosted apps

iRhythm, maker of the Zio patch, says attackers who social-engineered access to third-party-hosted apps took data on at least 360,000 patients. The records link patients' insurance numbers to their device serial numbers, enough detail for a caller to pass as the company.

The Watch · Security desk

Send a correction

Stolen data: 298,647 in Texas, 69,526 in South Carolina Number of people iRhythm said had information stolen, by state.

Bar comparison of people iRhythm said had information stolen: Texas, 298,647 people; South Carolina, 69,526 people.

People iRhythm said had information stolen, by state In people

Stolen data: 298,647 in Texas, 69,526 in South Carolina (People iRhythm said had information stolen, by state)
ItemValueClaim
Texas298,647 people4
South Carolina69,526 people5

What happened

  • Investigators found the intruders had access to iRhythm's systems from June 3 to June 8.
  • In a June 8-K, iRhythm told the SEC that a threat actor demanded payment in exchange for not publicly disclosing the stolen information.
  • The exposed fields also include names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, patient account numbers and dates of service.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure Patients were exposed even though the devices and clinical systems were not touched, because their records were in hosted business applications that one social engineering attack could reach.
  • Who has to decide decision Device makers keeping insurance and account data in third-party-hosted business apps have to treat every account on those apps as a route to protected health information.
  • What it costs cost With iRhythm reporting no financial or operational hit, the cost of this breach falls on the patients whose records an extortionist now holds.

The two state filings already exceed the company's floor of 360,000 [1]. The Texas and South Carolina notices alone total 368,173 people [20], and that is before any count from California, where iRhythm also filed [6]. A company spokesperson declined to give the full number, telling Recorded Future News that iRhythm "responded promptly after detecting the unauthorized access and, once the scope was verified, notified affected individuals and applicable regulators." [7]

During the intrusion, iRhythm says, the attackers accessed and downloaded the data [12]. Its June 8-K said the company "received communications from a threat actor claiming to have obtained sensitive information, including proprietary data, patient protected health information and other personal information." [15] "Since receipt of the communications, the Company has confirmed that certain data was exfiltrated from those applications," iRhythm said [17].

iRhythm's best-known product is the Zio Patch, a chest-worn sensor for long-term cardiac monitoring and arrhythmia detection [3]. "The incident did not affect iRhythm clinical systems or medical devices and did not result in a loss of service or disruption to operations," the spokesperson said [8]. The company says products, manufacturing and distribution were untouched and its finances were not disturbed. It reported $224.2 million in Q2 revenue [14]. The patient records were held somewhere else, in business applications hosted by a third party [10].

Disclosure came in two stages. Investors read about the extortion claim in the June 8-K [15]. Patients and state regulators are getting counts and letters through notices iRhythm began filing this week, according to The Record [2]. The applications and their host have not been named [10]. On the current record, the attackers got in by social engineering their way into access to those applications [10].

The Record counts dozens of medical device makers hit over the last two years, in incidents that reached business and manufacturing systems [18]. It lists Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Stryker, UFP, Masimo, Surmodics, Artivion and Zoll among those whose attacks leaked data on millions and caused supply chain problems [19]. No group has publicly claimed the iRhythm attack [13]. With operations intact, the only pressure on iRhythm was the stolen data [14][16]. The company says it has "no evidence that any personal information has been or will be used to commit identity theft." [21]

What to watch

  • A California total, or filings in other states, that pushes the count past the 368,173 already listed in Texas and South Carolina.
  • Disclosure of which hosted applications were entered and who runs them; matching intrusions at other customers of that provider would point to a supplier pattern.
  • Publication of the stolen data, or a claim of responsibility by a named group.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence65
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap0
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence68
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Medical device maker iRhythm said the data of at least 360,000 people was breached in a June cyberattack.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    iRhythm began filing breach notices in multiple states this week, telling regulators and victims that the incident occurred on June 8 and involved unauthorized access to third-party systems.

    Reported Supported Source: The Record (Recorded Future News)View cited source
  3. [3]

    iRhythm is best known for Zio Patch, a sensor patients wear on their chest for long-term continuous cardiac monitoring and heart arrhythmia detection.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    iRhythm said 298,647 people in Texas had information stolen.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    iRhythm said 69,526 people in South Carolina had information stolen.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    iRhythm also filed breach notices in California.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    A company spokesperson declined to say the full number of victims, telling Recorded Future News that iRhythm "responded promptly after detecting the unauthorized access and, once the scope was verified, notified affected individuals and applicable regulators."

    Reported Supported Source: iRhythm spokesperson, to Recorded Future NewsView cited source
  8. [8]

    "The incident did not affect iRhythm clinical systems or medical devices and did not result in a loss of service or disruption to operations," the spokesperson said.

    Reported Supported Source: iRhythm spokespersonView cited source
  9. [9]

    An investigation found hackers had access to company systems between June 3 and June 8.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    The hackers gained access to unidentified third-party-hosted business applications through a social engineering attack.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    Stolen information includes names, addresses, phone numbers, iRhythm patient account numbers, iRhythm device serial numbers, patient insurance numbers, dates of service and date of birth.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    The cybercriminals accessed and downloaded the information, according to a statement from iRhythm.

    Reported Supported Source: iRhythm statementView cited source
  13. [13]

    No hacking group ever publicly took credit for the attack.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    The cyberattack did not impact iRhythm's products, devices, manufacturing process or distribution operations, iRhythm said its finances were not disturbed, and the company reported $224.2 million in Q2 revenue.

    Reported Supported Source: iRhythmView cited source
  15. [15]

    In a June 8-K filing with the SEC, iRhythm said it "received communications from a threat actor claiming to have obtained sensitive information, including proprietary data, patient protected health information and other personal information."

    Reported Supported Source: iRhythm 8-K filingView cited source
  16. [16]

    "The communications from the threat actor demanded payment in exchange for not publicly disclosing this information," the company said.

    Reported Supported Source: iRhythmView cited source
  17. [17]

    "Since receipt of the communications, the Company has confirmed that certain data was exfiltrated from those applications," iRhythm said.

    Reported Supported Source: iRhythmView cited source
  18. [18]

    Medical device companies have been hit by cybercriminals over the last two years, with dozens experiencing cybersecurity incidents that impacted business and manufacturing systems.

    Reported Supported Source: The Record (Recorded Future News)View cited source
  19. [19]

    Cyberattacks on Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Stryker, UFP, Masimo, Surmodics, Artivion and Zoll have leaked the sensitive medical data of millions and caused supply chain issues.

    Reported Supported Source: The Record (Recorded Future News)View cited source
  20. [20]

    The Texas and South Carolina notices together count 368,173 people.

    Derived Supported
  21. [21]

    iRhythm said it has "no evidence that any personal information has been or will be used to commit identity theft."

    Reported Insufficient Source: iRhythmView cited source

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. securityweek.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    iRhythm Data Breach Impacts at Least 360,000 People
  2. therecord.media

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Hundreds of thousands impacted by data breach at biosensor firm iRhythm

Topics and entities

Entities