Kalshi and Coinbase filed near-identical US stock perpetual futures on the same day
Both venues want cash-settled contracts on the largest US listings, with funding payments in place of an expiry date, and because the underlyings are securities the products need the SEC as well as the CFTC.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- Kalshi filed with the CFTC on or about September 18, 2026 for cash-settled perpetual futures on up to 58 large-cap US stocks and ETFs, each with a market capitalisation above $100bn.
- Coinbase Derivatives filed the same day for nearly identical products, covering roughly 50 to 60 liquid US equities on a 24/5 schedule with hourly funding rate adjustments.
- Because the underlyings are securities, both products fall under the security futures regime. That puts oversight jointly with the SEC and the CFTC.
Why it matters
- What it limits constraint Launch dates sit with the regulators: the Shad-Johnson jurisdictional line means two agencies have to act, and the slower one sets the timetable.
- Who's exposed exposure CME's suit goes at the enabling structure, so a win there reaches past these two equity filings to the crypto perpetual futures already trading under it.
- What it costs cost The cost of holding becomes a funding stream priced 120 times a week on Coinbase's schedule, with the market setting it hour by hour.
- What's now possible capability An earnings release printed after the 4 PM Eastern close becomes tradeable immediately; a cash equity position cannot be adjusted until the next open.
Next story · Invest · yesterday
SEC clears Cboe to list $1 binary options on Coinbase, MARA and Robinhood metricsConfirmed4 publishers
The 15.5% minimum margin decides who these contracts are for. A dollar posted at the floor carries about $6.45 of notional [16], and a 15.5% move against the position consumes the whole posting [17]. Cryptobriefing, which reported both filings, called that "leveraged but not reckless exposure, roughly 6x leverage at the margin floor" [13].
The two scopes come out of the same universe, so whoever lists second is listing a substitute [14]: up to 58 names above $100bn for Kalshi [9], roughly 50 to 60 liquid US equities for Coinbase Derivatives [5].
These contracts run on indefinitely, so the roll date disappears [2]. The holder pays or receives funding instead, hourly in Coinbase's filing, across a week that trades 24 hours a day for five days [5], which is 120 resets between Monday and Friday [19]. There is no domestic precedent for what that stream costs on a single stock, because no equity-linked perpetual future has launched in the US market [11].
Both venues filed at the CFTC, and both already hold CFTC approval for crypto perps granted in May 2026 [6]. Equities take a different route. Because the underlyings are securities, cryptobriefing reports, the products fall into the security futures framework and require joint SEC and CFTC oversight, with the Shad-Johnson Accord governing jurisdiction [7][8]. CME Group, separately, has been litigating against the framework that enables perpetual futures at all, on the argument that it does not properly account for the risks of never-expiring contracts [15]. That case is aimed at the structure, so a CME win would reach the crypto contracts already approved under it [20].
Both venues are staying off the spot side. The contracts settle in cash, which leaves the shares with whoever already holds them, along with the ownership rights and the dividends [9][10]. Kalshi would clear through Kalshi Klear, its own CFTC-registered clearinghouse, and trade on the central limit order book it already operates [3], so the incremental spend comes down to a margin model and a listing [18].
In my view the binding constraint here is the SEC's calendar, since neither filing can be cleared by the commodity futures process alone [7]. The counter-case is respectable: May 2026 showed both agencies can move on a perp when they want to [6], and cash settlement on 58 companies each worth more than $100bn is about the mildest version of the instrument anyone could file [9]. If either venue lists these contracts without a joint SEC action, I have the constraint wrong.
What to watch
- A joint SEC and CFTC action on the two filings, and whether it arrives as an approval order or a request for comment.
- Any ruling or hearing schedule in CME Group's litigation against the perpetual futures framework.
- Whether the proposed margin floor survives review, and whether Coinbase keeps hourly funding at listing.
Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence62
- Adoption3
- Hype gap+12
- Incentives45
- Confidence64
Perspective Coverage
3 publishers- Builder
- Builder 20%
- Operator
- Operator 38%
- Investor
- Investor 42%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Kalshi, the CFTC-regulated prediction market turned derivatives platform, filed proposals to offer perpetual futures contracts tied to individual US stocks and ETFs, submitted around September 18, 2026.
- [2]
Perpetual futures are derivatives contracts that never expire; unlike traditional futures that settle on a specific date, they use periodic funding payments to keep their price tethered to the underlying asset.
- [3]
Kalshi plans to clear these products through Kalshi Klear, its own CFTC-registered clearinghouse, using its existing central limit order book infrastructure.
- [4]
Coinbase Derivatives filed its own CFTC filing on the same date, seeking approval for nearly identical products.
- [5]
Coinbase Derivatives' filing covers single-stock and ETF perpetual futures on roughly 50 to 60 liquid US equities, with contracts operating on a 24/5 schedule with hourly funding rate adjustments.
- [6]
Both Kalshi and Coinbase received CFTC approval for crypto perpetual futures in May 2026.
- [7]
Both filings require joint oversight from the SEC and CFTC, since the underlying assets are securities, which triggers a security futures regulatory framework rather than a pure commodity futures process.
- [8]
The Shad-Johnson Accord is the decades-old agreement governing jurisdiction over security futures.
- [9]
Kalshi's proposed contracts would be cash-settled, meaning no shares change hands at any point, and would track up to 58 large-cap US stocks and ETFs, all with market capitalizations north of $100B, including Apple, Microsoft, Tesla and Nvidia.
- [10]
Kalshi's contracts would carry minimum margins of around 15.5% and would not confer any ownership rights or dividend entitlements.
- [11]
No perpetual futures product tied to equities has actually launched in the US market.
- [12]
US stock markets close at 4 PM Eastern, and a perpetual contract trading nearly around the clock gives participants the ability to react to overnight news, earnings releases or geopolitical events without waiting for the opening bell.
- [13]
"The 15.5% margin requirement suggests these contracts are designed for leveraged but not reckless exposure, roughly 6x leverage at the margin floor."
- [14]
The two proposed product sets are drawn from the same pool of the largest, most liquid US listings, so the second venue to list would be offering a substitute for the first.
- [15]
CME Group has been engaged in litigation challenging the regulatory framework that enables perpetual futures products, questioning whether the current regulatory structure properly accounts for the unique risks of never-expiring contracts.
- [16]
At a 15.5% minimum margin, each dollar of margin posted supports about $6.45 of notional exposure.
- [17]
At the 15.5% margin floor, an adverse move of 15.5% in the underlying stock equals the entire margin posted.
- [18]
Because the contracts settle in cash and would run on Kalshi's existing order book and clearinghouse, the incremental build is a margin model and a listing, not share custody or settlement.
- [19]
Hourly funding on a 24/5 schedule is 120 funding resets per week.
- [20]
Because CME's litigation challenges the framework that enables perpetual futures rather than the two equity filings, an adverse ruling would also reach the crypto perpetual futures already approved under that framework.
Sources
3 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- cointelegraph.comKalshi joins Coinbase with filing for US stock perpetual futures
1 article · September 19, 2026
- crowdfundinsider.comKalshi Files with SEC and CFTC to List US Single-Stock Perpetual Futures
1 article · September 20, 2026
- cryptobriefing.comKalshi files for perpetual futures tied to US stocks, joins Coinbase in race to bring crypto-native trading to equities
1 article · September 19, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- Prediction Markets
- Security futures
- Perpetual futures