Skip to content

Leadership Independently confirmed2 publishers 2 min read Published

Five environmental groups take the 34.9-mpg fuel economy rollback to a federal appeals court

Five environmental groups asked a federal appeals court to review the Trump administration's cut of 2031 fuel economy targets to 34.9 mpg from a projected 50.4. Automaker and fleet plans built on the looser target now depend on a rule the petitioners want stopped.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Five environmental groups take the 34.9-mpg fuel economy rollback to a federal appeals court
Generated illustration

What happened

  • Plaintiffs are the Sierra Club, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Conservation Law Foundation, the Environmental Defense Fund and Public Citizen.
  • Named in the petition are Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and NHTSA administrator Jonathan Morrison, whose agency sets the fuel economy rules.
  • The administration lowered the standards on Monday, while it was negotiating with Iran over reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Gas prices have hovered around $4.50 in recent weeks and diesel prices have hit unprecedented highs, according to AAA.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure Automakers that trim 2031 efficiency programs to the new target are exposed if a ruling pushes the requirement back toward the earlier 50.4 mpg projection.
  • What it sets up precedent Having been rewritten once between administrations, the 2031 target stays open to the next rulemaking even if the government wins in court.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction DOT's 1.3 billion barrel oil figure and NHTSA's earlier 14 billion gallon estimate use different units and comparisons, so the published numbers cannot test the rule's oil benefit against the standard it replaced.

Next story · Leadership · Sep 28

Trump's CAFE rollback cuts the projected 2031 fleet average to 34.9 mpg

Confirmed2 publishers

The 2031 target is now 15.5 mpg below the Biden-era projection [16], a cut of about 31 percent [17]. Anyone setting the efficiency content of that model year has two numbers to weigh: the one in the new rule and the one it replaced [5].

The petitioners want the rule halted. "We're asking the courts to put a stop to this callous giveaway to Big Oil and Big Auto," David Pettit, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, said in a statement [7]. Katherine Garcia, director of the Sierra Club's Clean Transportation for All program, made the legal argument directly. "It is unlawful for Trump to turn back the clock on fuel-efficient cars, forcing drivers to waste more money on gas and communities to breathe toxic air," she said [6]. AP's account does not say which circuit will hear the petition or whether the groups have sought a stay [1].

The administration is also arguing on legality. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the new rule cuts the "illegal mandate that forced automakers to produce more expensive electric vehicles that American families didn't want" [9]. According to AP, there has never been a mandate that manufacturers sell EVs or that Americans buy them; the earlier standards pushed automakers toward a mix of electric, hybrid and more efficient gasoline vehicles [13]. The administration also said the change would give buyers more choice of vehicle and move them into newer, safer cars [8]. The Transportation Department and NHTSA did not immediately respond to AP's request for comment [10].

The case for planning to the looser number comes from automakers. Auto companies and industry groups broadly welcomed the change, saying the Biden rules were too stringent and did not benefit consumers [12]. Building to that preference is a bet that the rule survives review. The trade-off is direct. An automaker that cuts efficiency work to match 34.9 mpg keeps the savings if the rule holds, and has to rebuild that work with less time before 2031 if it falls [5]. One that keeps the work pays now for engineering it may never need.

This week the 2031 standard is 34.9 mpg [5]. The exposure is in this year's budgets, where spending on 2031 efficiency is set against a target now before an appeals court [1].

What to watch

  • Which circuit takes the petition, and whether the five groups ask for a stay of the 34.9 mpg standard while the case is briefed.
  • Whether automaker trade groups that welcomed the rollback move to intervene in defense of the rule.
  • How DOT and NHTSA answer, in court filings, AP's reporting that no EV sales mandate ever existed.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence72
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+10
Incentives65
Confidence68
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    A group of environmental organizations sued the Trump administration on Friday over its relaxation of Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules, filing a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals.

    Reported Supported Source: AP via ABC NewsView cited source
  2. [2]

    On Monday the Trump administration lowered CAFE standards; the announcement was made as the administration negotiated with Iran over reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

    Reported Supported Source: AP via ABC NewsView cited source
  3. [3]

    The petition was filed against Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Jonathan Morrison, administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which sets the rules.

    Reported Supported Source: AP via ABC NewsView cited source
  4. [4]

    The Center for Biological Diversity, the Conservation Law Foundation, the Environmental Defense Fund, Public Citizen and the Sierra Club filed the suit.

    Reported Supported Source: AP via ABC NewsView cited source
  5. [5]

    The Transportation Department and NHTSA lowered the standards to an industry fleetwide average of roughly 34.9 miles per gallon for passenger cars and light trucks in the 2031 model year, down from a projected 50.4 mpg under rules set by the Biden administration.

    Reported Supported Source: AP via ABC NewsView cited source
  6. [6]

    "It is unlawful for Trump to turn back the clock on fuel-efficient cars, forcing drivers to waste more money on gas and communities to breathe toxic air."

    Reported Supported Source: Katherine Garcia, director of Sierra Club's Clean Transportation for All program, in a statementView cited source
  7. [7]

    "We're asking the courts to put a stop to this callous giveaway to Big Oil and Big Auto."

    Reported Supported Source: David Pettit, attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, in a statementView cited source
  8. [8]

    The administration said the change would provide Americans more vehicle choice and encourage consumers to buy newer, safer vehicles.

    Reported Supported Source: Trump administration, as reported by APView cited source
  9. [9]

    Duffy said the new rule cuts the "illegal mandate that forced automakers to produce more expensive electric vehicles that American families didn't want."

    Reported Supported Source: Transportation Secretary Sean DuffyView cited source
  10. [10]

    The Department of Transportation and NHTSA did not immediately respond to the Associated Press request for comment.

    Reported Supported Source: AP via ABC NewsView cited source
  11. [11]

    Gas prices have hovered around $4.50 and diesel has hit unprecedented heights in recent weeks, according to AAA.

    Reported Supported Source: AAA, as reported by APView cited source
  12. [12]

    Auto companies and industry groups broadly welcomed Monday's change, saying the rules under the Biden administration were too stringent and did not benefit consumers.

    Reported Supported Source: AP via ABC NewsView cited source
  13. [13]

    There has never been a mandate that manufacturers sell EVs or Americans buy them; the rules and other cleaner vehicle standards incentivized automakers to sell a mix of electric, hybrid electric and increasingly efficient gasoline-powered vehicles.

    Reported Supported Source: AP reportingView cited source
  14. [14]

    The DOT said the rule would cut yearly oil consumption in 2050 by about 1.3 billion barrels compared with yearly oil consumption in 2024.

    Reported Supported Source: Department of Transportation, as reported by APView cited source
  15. [15]

    NHTSA had estimated the 2024 standards would have saved 14 billion gallons of gasoline from being burned by 2050.

    Reported Supported Source: NHTSA estimate, as reported by APView cited source
  16. [16]

    The new 2031 target is 15.5 mpg below the Biden-era projection.

    Derived Supported
  17. [17]

    The new 2031 target is about 31 percent below the Biden-era projection.

    Derived Supported

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. abcnews.com

    1 article · October 2, 2026

    Environmental groups sue Trump administration over eased vehicle fuel economy rules
  2. cbsnews.com

    1 article · October 2, 2026

    Environmental groups sue Trump administration over vehicle MPG rollback

Topics and entities

Topics

Entities