California's robotaxi law requires operators to send technicians to stuck cars from July 2028
California's SB 1246 makes robotaxi firms send technicians to stuck cars, with fines up to $10,000 a vehicle when one blocks responders over 30 minutes. For operators, clearing a stuck car now takes paid field staff in every California city they serve.
The Product Desk

What happened
- During a system failure or outage, operators must tell local officials where their affected vehicles are and what condition they are in.
- Anyone who drives a robotaxi remotely in California must be based in the United States and hold a US driver's license.
- The state DMV will write some details of the law later, including how quickly technicians must respond.
- Waymo and Zoox have both said they will comply with the new requirements.
Why it matters
- Who has to decide decision Launch and fleet-growth plans for a California city now start with a technician roster sized to that city's streets and traffic.
- Who's exposed exposure Every city and county an operator enters becomes a separate party able to take it to court over a blocked emergency scene.
- What it limits constraint Running direct remote driving for California fleets from cheaper offshore centers is off the table for any operator.
Next story · Invest · 4d ago
NHTSA's Tesla school-zone petition rests on four reports across about 1,000 robotaxisConfirmed6 publishers
A TechCrunch investigation earlier this year found several incidents where the person who moved a stuck Waymo was a first responder, driving it by hand [17]. Waymo describes its own approach to trouble as remote assistance. The self-driving system stays in control, and a staff member sends guidance or software commands if needed [10]. SB 1246, which Gov. Gavin Newsom signed, adds a company employee standing at the car [7][1].
The dispatch triggers are broad: a crash, a stuck car, a blocked road or emergency access route, or any request from first responders [1]. Neither report puts a cost on staffing for them. The scale is easier to see. Waymo has about 4,000 cars in its US commercial fleet and about 1,200 in the Bay Area, so roughly 30 percent sit in one region [18][21]. It sells driverless rides in the Bay Area, Los Angeles and San Diego, and each of those metros now needs technicians within reach of any street its cars use [19][1].
Fines are counted per vehicle. Gizmodo reports penalties of up to $5,000 for violations, and up to $10,000 per vehicle when a car interferes with an emergency operation for more than 30 minutes after officials request a technician [3]. Cortese's office cited Waymo cars blocking San Francisco streets during Fourth of July celebrations, and a December power outage that stalled about 1,500 Waymo vehicles [12]. Take the worst case, where every car in an outage that size blocked an emergency scene past the 30-minute mark. The per-vehicle cap alone would total $15 million [20].
The remote-driver rule covers fewer people than it sounds. In the law, a remote driver is a person who directly drives the car from afar [5]. Tesla is the only company that has said publicly it has operators who can take direct control of its robotaxis [9]. Waymo's remote assistance staff work in a global network that includes the Philippines, with command centers in Arizona and Michigan [16]. Going by the definition as TechCrunch describes it, assistance where the software keeps control falls outside the rule [5][10]. Zoox says its remote operations teams are based in the US [11].
"California has embraced autonomous vehicles, but we cannot embrace innovation at the expense of public safety," said state Sen. Dave Cortese, who introduced the bill [13]. NHTSA had already identified what it called a "clear pattern" of driverless vehicles interfering with first responders [6]. Administrator Jonathan Morrison wrote in a letter to AV companies that "Emergency scenes are not rare or extreme 'edge cases.'" [8] Waymo focused on the final text. "We are grateful for the amendments made to the bill, which ensure autonomous vehicle operators can still feasibly serve Californians," a Waymo spokesperson said [14].
For the person running field operations, two numbers set the plan. One is the most cars that can stall at once in one jurisdiction. The other is the response window the DMV writes [4]. If breakdowns come one at a time and the window is loose, I'd expect on-call staff to cover it. A tight window turns that into scheduled shifts near the busiest parts of each service area. Mass stalls under a loose window put more weight on the outage notice to the city [2] and on a surge roster. When mass stalls meet a tight window, the size of the technician roster limits how many cars it makes sense to run in that city. In every case, the team will be judged on minutes from an official's request to a cleared road, because the $10,000 clock starts at the request [3].
What to watch
- The DMV's required response times for local incident technicians, which will set how many people each operator keeps on call per city.
- The first suit a California city or county brings for the $10,000 per-vehicle fine after July 1, 2028.
- Whether Tesla relocates its direct-control remote operators, or changes how it describes them, before the US-based rule applies.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence74
- Adoption40
- Hype gap+15
- Incentives55
- Confidence70
Perspective Coverage
3 publishers- Builder
- Builder 25%
- Operator
- Operator 55%
- Investor
- Investor 20%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Under the law, autonomous vehicle companies must dispatch on-site workers, known as 'local incident technicians,' when a vehicle crashes, gets stuck, blocks traffic or emergency access, or when first responders request help.
- [2]
Companies must notify local officials about the status and location of vehicles affected by a system failure or outage.
- [3]
The law allows cities and counties to take companies to court, where they can face fines of up to $5,000 for violations and up to $10,000 per vehicle if an autonomous vehicle interferes with an emergency operation for more than 30 minutes after officials request a technician.
- [4]
The law goes into effect in July 2028. The California Department of Motor Vehicles, which regulates autonomous vehicles in the state, will set guidelines on certain aspects of the new law, including required response times.
- [5]
Under the law, AV developers can only employ remote drivers who are based in the United States and hold a U.S. driver's license; the law's 'remote drivers' term refers to a human who directly operates or drives the vehicle from afar.
- [6]
In July, NHTSA said it had identified a 'clear pattern' of driverless vehicles interfering with law enforcement and other first responders.
- [7]
Senate Bill 1246 was signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
- [8]
"Emergency scenes are not rare or extreme 'edge cases.'"
- [9]
Tesla is the only company that has publicly stated that it has remote operators who can take direct control of its robotaxis.
- [10]
Waymo and other companies have said they use forms of remote assistance, in which the self-driving system remains in control and a human employee can provide guidance or send software commands if needed.
- [11]
Zoox's remote operations teams are based in the United States, according to the company.
- [12]
Cortese's press release cited multiple Waymo vehicles blocking streets during San Francisco's Fourth of July celebrations and a power outage last December that stalled around 1,500 of the company's vehicles.
- [13]
"California has embraced autonomous vehicles, but we cannot embrace innovation at the expense of public safety."
- [14]
"We are grateful for the amendments made to the bill, which ensure autonomous vehicle operators can still feasibly serve Californians."
- [15]
Companies including Waymo and Zoox have said they will comply.
- [16]
Waymo has a global network of remote assistance staff, including in the Philippines, and operates command centers in Arizona and Michigan.
- [17]
A TechCrunch investigation earlier this year identified a number of incidents in which Waymo relied on first responders to manually drive its vehicles when they encountered problems.
- [18]
Waymo has about 4,000 autonomous vehicles in its commercial fleet across the US, about 1,200 of them in the San Francisco Bay Area.
- [19]
Waymo offers commercial driverless rides in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles and San Diego; Zoox offers limited free rides to select riders in San Francisco; Tesla and others have permits to test in California.
- [20]
If all of about 1,500 stalled vehicles each drew the maximum $10,000 per-vehicle fine, the total would be $15 million.
- [21]
About 30 percent of Waymo's US commercial fleet is in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Sources
3 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- engadget.comCalifornia will fine robotaxi companies if their vehicles block first responders
1 article · October 3, 2026
- gizmodo.comCalifornia Cracks Down on Robotaxis That Block First Responders
1 article · October 2, 2026
- techcrunch.comRobotaxi operators will face fines for blocking first responders
1 article · October 1, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- AV remote operations
- Autonomous Vehicle Regulation
- Autonomous Vehicles
Entities
- Tesla
- Zoox
- NHTSA
- Jonathan Morrison
- Waymo
- Gavin Newsom
- California Senate Bill 1246
- California Department of Motor Vehicles