Skip to content

Science Independently confirmed2 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

Wild blacktip sharks turn away from low-frequency sound up to 74 meters from the source

Florida Atlantic University researchers filmed wild blacktip sharks turning away from low-frequency sounds played as far as 74 meters away. The speaker was played loud enough to startle, so the result maps hearing range and direction in open water and leaves everyday human noise untested.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Florida Atlantic University researchers used an underwater speaker and an aerial drone to test hearing in free-swimming blacktip sharks, reporting in Integrative Organismal Biology.
  • The team played tones in three bands between 100 and 800 Hz, plus a 10 kHz control tone outside the known hearing range of sharks.
  • The sharks responded to all three low-frequency bands and did not respond to the 10 kHz control.
  • The farthest measured response came at 74 m (243 feet), with sharks rapidly changing course away from the speaker.
  • More than 70% of responses occurred in the acoustic far field, and lower frequencies were detected from farther away and at lower sound levels.

Why it matters

  • What's now possible capability Pairing drone tracking with hydrophone-mapped sound fields lets researchers tie a free-swimming shark's turn to the sound level it received, a measurement tank reflections make hard to get.
  • What it limits constraint The 74 m range belongs to one speaker played loud enough to startle, so comparing it with any other noise source means working from received levels in the paper itself.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction The release's own opening figure of 76 m rounds up the 74 m measured maximum, so anyone citing the range should use 74 m.

Next story · Science · Sep 30

Wild blacktip sharks off Florida turn away from low-pitched sounds up to 74 meters away

One report1 publisher

I would defend the control tone before any other part of this design. It sits at 12.5 times the upper edge of the highest test band [20], and it came out of the same speaker on the same rig as the test tones [3]. A shark reacting to the equipment, or to the act of playback, should have reacted to the control as well. None did [7].

The distance figure needs one correction. The farthest response, 74 m, is 243 feet [8]. The release opens with "nearly 250 feet (76 meters)" [10], 2 m beyond the measured maximum [19].

Distance is also a property of this speaker at this volume. The sounds were played at high intensity to startle the sharks [4]. Calibrated hydrophones mapped sound levels at different distances so the team could calculate what each shark heard at the moment it responded [5]. That received level is the number another researcher could carry to a different sound source. The release reports the far-field share of responses [9] but does not give the received levels, or the count of sharks and responses behind the percentage.

The far-field responses are what interest the researchers. "What makes this finding particularly interesting is that the sharks were responding to sounds beyond the acoustic near field, where the sound behaves differently than it does close to the source," said Stephen Kajiura, the senior author and a professor of biological sciences at Florida Atlantic University [11][18]. Sharks lack the gas-filled swim bladder that helps many bony fish detect sound pressure. They are thought to rely on inner-ear structures, including the macula neglecta, that sense movement and vibration [13]. Kajiura said the result "suggests that they are detecting the particle motion associated with sound even at considerable distances from the source" [12].

The open-water setting made the measurement possible. Blacktips gather in large numbers along the Palm Beach County coast each winter [16]. "Their abundance and accessibility made it possible for us to observe them from above without disturbing their natural behavior, while also presenting controlled underwater sounds," Kajiura said [15]. A drone filmed the sharks from 40 to 50 m up, and frame-by-frame analysis measured each response distance and heading change [6]. The speaker drifted up to 19 m from the anchored boat to limit the boat's influence [2]. According to the release, working in the wild avoids the wall reflections and other limitations of laboratory tanks [14].

The release calls the work the first quantified evidence that free-swimming sharks detect and orient away from sound in the acoustic far field [17]. On the method described, that claim about hearing holds. A loud, low-frequency source changed the heading of blacktips at up to 74 m [8]. Saying that human-made noise changes shark behavior at such ranges is a larger claim. It would need received-level thresholds and a stimulus closer to that noise, and this playback was designed to startle [4]. The behavior the release describes measuring is response distance and change in swimming direction [6].

What to watch

  • A repeat of the drone-and-hydrophone design with quieter or longer-lasting sounds would test whether the turning response appears at levels sharks meet routinely.
  • The same open-water setup applied to other shark species would show whether far-field detection is specific to blacktips.
  • Follow-up tracking of whether startled blacktips leave an area or return after playback would show whether a turn has any lasting effect.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence70
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+12
Incentives30
Confidence68
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    A Florida Atlantic University study of blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus), published in Integrative Organismal Biology, used an underwater speaker, an aerial drone and free-swimming sharks.

    Reported Supported Source: Florida Atlantic University release via phys.orgView cited source
  2. [2]

    The study ran in shallow nearshore waters of Palm Beach County; researchers anchored a boat and deployed an underwater speaker that drifted with the current up to 19 meters from the boat, minimizing its influence on the sharks.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  3. [3]

    Researchers tested three ranges of low-frequency sound, 100-200 Hz, 200-400 Hz and 400-800 Hz, plus a 10-kilohertz control sound outside the known hearing range of sharks.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  4. [4]

    The sounds were played at high intensity to startle the sharks, not to attract them.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  5. [5]

    Calibrated hydrophones were used to map sound levels at different distances so researchers could calculate exactly what the sharks heard when they responded.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  6. [6]

    An aerial drone tracked free-swimming sharks from 40 to 50 meters above the water; frame-by-frame video analysis measured the sharks' response distance and changes in swimming direction.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  7. [7]

    The sharks responded to all three experimental sound ranges but not to the 10-kilohertz control.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  8. [8]

    The sharks detected low-frequency sounds from up to 74 meters (243 feet) away, farther than previously demonstrated under free-swimming conditions, and rapidly changed course away from the source, indicating they could determine the sound's direction.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  9. [9]

    More than 70% of responses occurred in the acoustic far field, and the sharks were more sensitive to lower frequencies, detecting them from farther away and at lower sound levels.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  10. [10]

    The release's opening says sharks changed direction away from the source even when it was nearly 250 feet (76 meters) away.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  11. [11]

    "What makes this finding particularly interesting is that the sharks were responding to sounds beyond the acoustic near field, where the sound behaves differently than it does close to the source,"

    Reported Supported Source: Stephen Kajiura, quoted in FAU releaseView cited source
  12. [12]

    "suggests that they are detecting the particle motion associated with sound even at considerable distances from the source"

    Reported Supported Source: Stephen Kajiura, quoted in FAU releaseView cited source
  13. [13]

    Sharks do not have the gas-filled swim bladder found in many bony fish, which can help detect sound pressure; they are thought to rely on their inner ears, including the macula neglecta, to detect movement and vibrations produced by sound.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  14. [14]

    Studying shark hearing in the wild lets researchers observe responses to sound without the reflections and other limitations of laboratory tanks.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  15. [15]

    "Their abundance and accessibility made it possible for us to observe them from above without disturbing their natural behavior, while also presenting controlled underwater sounds,"

    Reported Supported Source: Stephen Kajiura, quoted in FAU releaseView cited source
  16. [16]

    Blacktip sharks were chosen for their predictable seasonal aggregations off Southeast Florida; each winter large numbers gather along the Palm Beach County coast.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  17. [17]

    The release describes the results as the first quantified evidence that free-swimming sharks can detect and orient away from sound in the acoustic far field.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  18. [18]

    Stephen Kajiura is the study's senior author and a professor of biological sciences in FAU's Charles E. Schmidt College of Science.

    Reported Supported Source: FAU releaseView cited source
  19. [19]

    The release's opening figure of 76 m exceeds the measured maximum response distance of 74 m by 2 m.

    Derived Supported
  20. [20]

    The 10 kHz control tone is 12.5 times the upper edge (800 Hz) of the highest test band.

    Derived Supported

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · September 24, 2026

    Sharks can hear sounds nearly 250 feet away and find the source
  2. sciencealert.com

    1 article · October 6, 2026

    Sharks Can Hear Sounds Nearly 250 Feet Away, And Know Where They're Coming From

Topics and entities

Topics

  • Shark sensory biology
  • Marine Bioacoustics

Entities