Skip to content

Science Reports disagree4 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

Archival NASA-funded data confirm youngest known planet at under a million years old

Elias 2-24 b sits in a disk gap 55 times Earth's distance from its star, where formation models ask for at least five million years to build a Jupiter. Keck coronagraph images from 2018 and 2020 put it under a million years old.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Archival NASA-funded data confirm youngest known planet at under a million years old
Generated illustration

What happened

  • A team led by Andrea Bernardi of the Universidad Diego Portales in Chile published the result on Wednesday in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
  • The planet, Elias 2-24 b, is less than a million years old, the youngest known, and is still embedded in the disk of dust and gas its star was born in.
  • Current models predict about 5 million years to form a Jupiter-size planet at Jupiter's distance from the Sun, and even longer at wider separations.

Why it matters

  • What it limits constraint If the sub-million-year age survives scrutiny, the formation clock in these models has to run at least five times faster at a radius where the same models ask for more time.
  • What's now possible capability Coronagraph archives already on disk reach the newborn end of the planet population that transit surveys structurally cannot. Adding cases needs no new hardware.
  • What it sets up precedent The cheapest next candidates are disks where ALMA has already mapped a gap and another telescope has seen a dot in it, and this result shows two archival epochs can settle such an argument.

A gap in a dust disk only hints at a planet. ALMA mapped the gap around Elias 2-24 about a decade ago, and the Very Large Telescope later found a faint point of light sitting inside it [9]. Astronomers then argued about what the dot was, because formation theory said such gaps appear too early and too far from their stars for a planet to have carved them [10]. "The planets should be found within the gaps, since they are carving them," Bernardi said [5].

The Keck Observatory Archive, a NASA-funded partnership between the observatory and the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute at Caltech/IPAC, held the same point of light in coronagraph images from 2018 and 2020, and the team stitched those together to follow its motion over time [12]. The search covered archival coronagraph data on seven stars, each hosting a disk whose structures and gaps hint at planets forming [3]. Two other telescopes had already flagged this candidate.

Separation is what pushes on the models. The dot sits 55 times farther from its star than Earth is from the Sun [11]. Jupiter orbits at just over five times the Earth-Sun distance, which puts Elias 2-24 b roughly ten times farther out than Jupiter [15]. Models put about 5 million years on assembling a Jupiter-size planet at Jupiter's distance, and longer than that farther out [14]. An object of about Jupiter's mass and under a million years old, at ten times that radius, has to come together at least five times faster than the models allow at the easier distance [16].

The planets it displaces were already awkward. Lucas Cieza, a co-author and professor at the Instituto de Estudios Astrofisicos in Chile, said the previous record was a four-way tie between two planets at PDS 70 and two at WISPIT 2, all more than 5 million years old, and that the models already struggled with those [17]. "Elias 2-24 b shows us that even our best planet-formation models are still missing some important processes," he said [4].

By construction, the comparison sample is thin. Transits, which found most known exoplanets, work poorly on a planet buried in dust or orbiting far from its star, so the overwhelming majority of the 6,000 confirmed exoplanets are billions of years old and close in [6]. Otherwise the models lean on theory, simulation, and observations of young disks where no planet has been detected at all [7]. "We are mostly blind to these baby planets right now," Cieza said [8].

The record rests on the age, and NASA did not say how the age was derived [13]. A revision of that number would leave the detection in the gap untouched, and would move Elias 2-24 b back toward the PDS 70 and WISPIT 2 group without changing what the coronagraph saw. The star is about 450 light-years from Earth [18].

What to watch

  • A third Keck or VLT epoch testing whether the point source tracks orbital motion inside the gap.
  • Whether the other six disks in the archival search turn up companions in their own gaps.
  • An independent age estimate for the Elias 2-24 system; the sub-million-year figure is what makes this a record.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence68
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+20
Incentives40
Confidence66

Perspective Coverage

5 publishers
Builder
Builder 55%
Operator
Operator 31%
Investor
Investor 14%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Astronomers have confirmed a world less than a million years old as the youngest known planet, using data from NASA-funded archives. The planet, called Elias 2-24 b, is still whirling in its natal disk of dust and gas.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    The results were published Wednesday in The Astrophysical Journal Letters by a team led by Andrea Bernardi, a doctoral candidate at the Universidad Diego Portales in Chile.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The team homed in on archival observations of seven stars observed with the coronagraph at the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii, which partners with NASA under a cooperative agreement. Each of those stars hosts a debris disk full of dust, gas and chunks of ice and rock, with structures and gaps hinting that planets may be forming.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    Lucas Cieza, a professor at the Instituto de Estudios Astrofisicos in Chile and a co-author of the paper, said: "Elias 2-24 b shows us that even our best planet-formation models are still missing some important processes."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    Bernardi said: "The planets should be found within the gaps, since they are carving them."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    Most exoplanets discovered so far were found using transits, which are hard to spot when planets are still deeply buried in dust or orbiting far from the star; an overwhelming majority of the 6,000 currently confirmed exoplanets are billions of years old and very close to their stars.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    Current planet-formation models rely on a combination of complex theories and simulations along with observations of young stars with disks where the presence of planets cannot yet be detected.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  8. [8]

    Cieza said: "We are mostly blind to these baby planets right now."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    About a decade ago, observations from ALMA in Chile showed a gap in the young star's dusty disk, and the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope then detected a faint point of light sitting in that gap.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    Astronomers debated whether the point of light could be a planet, because according to planet-formation theories such gaps appear too early and too far from their stars for planets to have formed.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    The glowing dot spotted in the disk gap was 55 times farther from its star than Earth is from the Sun, and already behaving like a forming planet.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    Bernardi's team searched the Keck Observatory Archive, a NASA-funded partnership between Keck Observatory and the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute at Caltech/IPAC, for the same point of light, found it in observations from 2018 and 2020, and stitched the observations together to analyse its motion over time.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  13. [13]

    The NASA account of the results does not describe how the team determined the age of the system.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    Current models predict that it takes about 5 million years to form a Jupiter-size planet at Jupiter's distance from the Sun, which is just over five times the distance from Earth to the Sun, and even longer farther out.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  15. [15]

    At 55 times the Earth-Sun distance, Elias 2-24 b orbits roughly ten times farther from its star than Jupiter does from the Sun.

    Derived Supported
  16. [16]

    A planet of roughly Jupiter's mass that is under a million years old must assemble at least five times faster than the roughly 5 million years models allow for a Jupiter-size planet at Jupiter's distance, and the model timescale is longer still at wider separations.

    Derived Supported
  17. [17]

    Cieza said planet-formation models already struggled to explain the previous record holders for the youngest known planet, a four-way tie between two planets orbiting the star PDS 70 and two planets orbiting the star WISPIT 2, all of which are more than 5 million years old.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  18. [18]

    The planet orbiting the star Elias 2-24 is about as massive as Jupiter, and the star is about 450 light-years from Earth.

    Reported ContestedView cited source

Sources

4 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. livescience.com

    1 article · September 17, 2026

    This million-year-old 'baby planet' is the youngest world scientists have ever discovered
  2. nasa.gov

    1 article · September 16, 2026

    Newfound ‘Baby’ Planet Smashes Record for Youngest Known World
  3. phys.org

    1 article · September 16, 2026

    Newfound 'baby' planet smashes record for youngest known world
  4. sciencedaily.com

    1 article · September 17, 2026

    Astronomers just found the youngest known planet ever
  5. wired.com

    1 article · October 5, 2026

    Astronomers Confirm Discovery of the Youngest Known Exoplanet Ever

Topics and entities

Entities