Skip to content

Security Widely confirmed10 publishers 2 min read Published Updated

MonsterCloud's owner is charged with passing off purchased ransomware keys as proprietary decryption

MonsterCloud owner Zohar Pinhasi is charged with paying ransomware gangs over $8 million for keys while billing victims over $19 million. The charges turn on when the firm paid, so a recovery contract has to fix the order of steps and the source of any sample decryption.

The Watch · Security desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Pinhasi faces one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and two of wire fraud over a scheme prosecutors say ran from June 2018 to June 2023.
  • He surrendered Wednesday, pleaded not guilty and was released on a $2 million bond, the U.S. Attorney's Office told BleepingComputer.
  • MonsterCloud, a Florida company, advertised tools and decryption techniques for recovering encrypted data without paying cybercriminals.
  • Prosecutors allege it had no such technology and instead paid ransomware operators for keys, then used those keys to restore customers' files.
  • The decrypted sample files MonsterCloud showed victims as "recovery proofs" came from the ransomware operations, the indictment alleges.

Why it matters

  • Who has to decide decision MonsterCloud's contracts already allowed for paying attackers, so a buyer relying on paper needs terms on when payment can happen and who produced any sample decryption offered as proof.
  • What it costs cost On the indictment's headline figures, victims paid about $2.40 for every dollar that reached the gangs.
  • Who's exposed exposure Hundreds of U.S. and Canadian companies that hired MonsterCloud between 2018 and 2023 may have funded ransomware operators while believing they had avoided paying them.
  • What it sets up precedent Nocella's office says it will pursue those who "cynically profit" from ransomware alongside the attackers, putting paid recovery intermediaries inside its stated scope.

The indictment acknowledges that some MonsterCloud contracts told customers the firm might communicate with or pay cybercriminals [6]. A customer who read one found a payment clause with a condition attached: the firm would contact attackers only if it could not decrypt the files by other means [6]. Prosecutors claim that contact was usually the first step [7].

A victim could not test that condition with the sample files. A decrypted sample shows only that someone holds a working key, and prosecutors say that someone was the gang [11].

The indictment gives two worked examples of the spread between what reached the attackers and what the customer paid. In one, MonsterCloud allegedly paid a gang about $8,200 and billed the victim about $150,000 [8], roughly 18 times the ransom [21]. In the other it allegedly paid about $236,000 and billed about $380,000 [10], a difference of $144,000 [22].

"As alleged in the indictment, by falsely claiming to decrypt ransomware without paying off the ransomers, the defendant re-victimized his clients while extracting a hefty profit for himself," U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. said [15]. A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of New York returned the indictment on September 23 [9]. If convicted, Pinhasi faces up to 20 years in prison [17].

The allegations match public reporting from 2019. ProPublica reported then that MonsterCloud sometimes paid ransomware operators while claiming to offer a solution other than paying the attackers [13]. Pinhasi disputed that the company had promised in advance it could decrypt files and denied misleading customers. He told ProPublica its methods varied by case and declined to disclose them [16]. Prosecutors say the scheme ran until June 2023 [2], four years after that reporting [20].

The ProPublica piece included a test. Security researcher Fabian Wosar told the outlet that he and another researcher built their own ransomware and approached recovery companies posing as victims, using ransom notes that carried email addresses the researchers controlled [14]. Offers to pay the ransom arrived at those addresses from anonymous senders, and Wosar traced them to firms including MonsterCloud and Proven Data [14]. The test and the indictment cover only the firms they name. Neither measures how common the practice is among recovery vendors.

What to watch

  • A response from Pinhasi's attorneys, Christopher Clark and Rodney Villazor, whom BleepingComputer has asked for comment.
  • Whether prosecutors charge the co-conspirators the indictment says worked with Pinhasi.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence72
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+12
Incentives62
Confidence74

Perspective Coverage

11 publishers
Builder
Builder 6%
Operator
Operator 75%
Investor
Investor 19%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Zohar Pinhasi, owner of ransomware remediation company MonsterCloud, has been charged with allegedly defrauding ransomware victims by secretly paying their attackers for decryptors while claiming to use proprietary technology to recover encrypted data.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    Pinhasi is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and two counts of wire fraud in connection with an alleged ransomware decryption scheme that prosecutors say ran from June 2018 to June 2023.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The U.S. Attorney's Office told BleepingComputer that Pinhasi surrendered Wednesday, pleaded not guilty, and was released on a $2 million bond.

    Reported Supported Source: U.S. Attorney's Office, via BleepingComputerView cited source
  4. [4]

    MonsterCloud LLC is a Florida-based ransomware remediation company that advertised tools and decryption techniques for recovering encrypted data without paying cybercriminals, according to the indictment.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    Prosecutors allege that Pinhasi and his co-conspirators had no proprietary decryption technology and instead contacted ransomware operators, paid them for decryption keys, and used those keys to restore customers' files.

    Reported Supported Source: Prosecutors, per the indictmentView cited source
  6. [6]

    The indictment acknowledges that some MonsterCloud contracts disclosed that the company might communicate with or pay cybercriminals, but those contracts allegedly stated MonsterCloud would contact attackers only if it could not decrypt a customer's files by other means.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    Prosecutors claim that dealing with cybercriminals was usually MonsterCloud's first step in obtaining decryption keys and recovering files.

    Reported Supported Source: ProsecutorsView cited source
  8. [8]

    In one incident cited in the indictment, Pinhasi allegedly paid a ransomware gang about $8,200 and charged the victim approximately $150,000.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    Zohar Pinhasi, 50, also known as 'Zack Silver' and 'Zack Green,' was indicted by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of New York on September 23 and arraigned Wednesday in federal court in Brooklyn.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    In another incident, prosecutors say Pinhasi paid approximately $236,000 and charged the customer about $380,000.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    The indictment alleges MonsterCloud used decrypted sample files as 'recovery proofs' to convince victims it could restore their data, even though those decrypted samples came from the ransomware operations.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    Prosecutors say Pinhasi and his co-conspirators facilitated more than $8 million in ransom payments while charging hundreds of companies in the United States and Canada more than $19 million for recovery and remediation services.

    Reported Supported Source: ProsecutorsView cited source
  13. [13]

    A 2019 ProPublica investigation reported that MonsterCloud sometimes paid ransomware operators while claiming to offer a solution other than paying the attackers.

    Reported Supported Source: ProPublica, as reported by BleepingComputerView cited source
  14. [14]

    Security researcher Fabian Wosar told ProPublica that he and another researcher created their own ransomware and approached recovery companies posing as victims, with ransom notes containing email addresses they controlled; those accounts received anonymous offers to pay the ransom, which Wosar traced to data recovery firms including MonsterCloud and Proven Data.

    Reported Supported Source: Fabian Wosar, via ProPublicaView cited source
  15. [15]

    "As alleged in the indictment, by falsely claiming to decrypt ransomware without paying off the ransomers, the defendant re-victimized his clients while extracting a hefty profit for himself," U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. said.

    Reported Supported Source: U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr.View cited source
  16. [16]

    Pinhasi disputed that MonsterCloud had promised in advance it could decrypt the files, denied misleading customers, and told ProPublica that MonsterCloud's recovery methods varied by case, declining to disclose them.

    Reported Supported Source: Zohar Pinhasi, to ProPublica in 2019View cited source
  17. [17]

    If convicted, Pinhasi faces up to 20 years in prison.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  18. [18]

    BleepingComputer contacted Pinhasi's attorneys, Christopher Clark and Rodney Villazor, for comment and said it would update its story if it received a response.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  19. [19]

    "Our Office will vigorously prosecute ransomware attackers who prey on Americans from across the world and those who cynically profit from their criminal activity," Nocella said.

    Reported Supported Source: U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr.View cited source
  20. [20]

    The alleged scheme continued for four years after the 2019 ProPublica reporting.

    Derived Supported
  21. [21]

    In the first cited case, the amount billed was roughly 18 times the ransom paid.

    Derived Supported
  22. [22]

    In the second cited case, the amount billed exceeded the ransom paid by $144,000.

    Derived Supported
  23. [23]

    On the indictment's headline figures, victims paid about $2.40 for every dollar of ransom that reached the gangs; both inputs are stated as lower bounds.

    Derived Supported

Sources

10 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. bleepingcomputer.com

    1 article · October 7, 2026

    Ransomware recovery CEO charged over secret ransom payments
  2. cyberscoop.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Ransomware recovery CEO indicted after allegedly paying hackers and pocketing millions
  3. gizmodo.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Feds Say Ransomware Expert’s Miracle Cure Was Just Paying the Hackers
  4. helpnetsecurity.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Ransomware recovery firm boss charged with secretly paying attackers and overcharging victims
  5. justice.gov

    1 article · October 7, 2026

    Known Cybersecurity Expert and Owner of Florida Ransomware Remediation Company Charged with Defrauding Clients
  6. scworld.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Ransomware remediation company owner charged with defrauding victims
  7. securityaffairs.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    MonsterCloud Owner Charged With Secretly Paying Ransomware Demands
  8. securityweek.com

    2 articles · October 8, 2026

    Fake Decryption Tools Masked $11M Markup in Ransomware Recovery Scheme - SecurityWeek
  9. techspot.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Ransomware recovery firm claimed it could decrypt files, but may have just paid hackers and pocketed the difference
  10. thehackernews.com

    2 articles · October 8, 2026

    MonsterCloud Owner Accused of Billing Over $19M While Secretly Paying Ransoms to Decrypt Data
  11. therecord.media

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    DOJ charges ransomware recovery CEO for secretly paying hackers

Topics and entities

Topics