KDB puts its 'Assassin(s)' film investment on the fund manager it backs
Korea Development Bank said the fund manager it backs chose to put 400 million won into 'Assassin(s)', while IBK defended its direct 2 billion won stake. About 93% of the 30.65 billion won a lawmaker questioned moved through bank-backed funds, the layer where KDB says it cannot take part.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- Both banks deny outside pressure, and IBK says its dedicated department reviewed the film under the same procedures it uses for other projects.
- Funds backed by IBK and KDB put 14.25 billion won and 14 billion won respectively into Hive Media Corp., the film's production company.
- People Power Party Rep. Joo Jin-woo released the investment records this week and called for an investigation into whether political pressure was involved.
- Hur Jin-ho's film, released Sept. 23, depicts the 1974 attempt on Park Chung-hee that killed first lady Yuk Young-soo, a portrayal the PPP calls a distortion of history.
Why it matters
- What it limits constraint Any inquiry into KDB's 14.4 billion won has to go through Company S and the fund's documents, since KDB says it supplied capital without a part in choosing targets.
- Who's exposed exposure IBK's 2 billion won, about 6.5% of the total, is the one decision a bank says it made itself, so its review department's file is the part of the record a lawmaker can test directly.
- What it sets up precedent If KDB's position goes unchallenged, state-bank capital can reach politically disputed productions through funds without the bank owning the choice of target.
Next story · Invest · 2d ago
IBK became Vietnam's 10th wholly foreign-owned bank after a nine-year approval processConfirmed2 publishers
Adding up the four figures in Joo's documents gives 30.65 billion won [12]. Only 2.4 billion won of that, about 7.8%, went into the film itself. The other 28.25 billion won, about 92%, bought into Hive Media Corp., the company that made it [13]. The producer stakes are roughly 12 times the film stakes [14].
By bank, IBK's side comes to 16.25 billion won and KDB's to 14.4 billion won [15], though the split by who made each decision is the more useful one. IBK put its 2 billion won in directly after its own review [9][2], and said "The allegation that the investment was decided at an outside request or through an abnormal process is not true" [3]. It is the only sum a bank says it chose itself, about 6.5% of the total. The remaining 28.65 billion won, about 93.5%, went through funds [16].
KDB's defense is that it supplied the capital and the manager picked the deal [4]. "Decision-making and follow-up management on individual investments by a fund are the exclusive responsibility of the asset manager," KDB said, according to Seoul Economic Daily's translation, adding that "KDB cannot take part in the investment process" [5][6]. By arguing this way, KDB also gives up any claim to have vetted what its money bought. IBK's statement, as both outlets report it, concerns its direct stake. The fund-manager argument is the one that would have to cover the 14.25 billion won the IBK-backed fund put into Hive Media [10].
The record supports three readings. Joo's request could end without an inquiry, leaving the two statements as the account [8]. An inquiry could ask for the fund documents, which would move the questions to Company S, the manager Seoul Economic Daily names for KDB's fund [7], and to whoever runs the IBK-backed fund. Or scrutiny could narrow to IBK's 2 billion won, the one sum backed by a bank's own review file [2].
I'd expect the second, because the producer stakes hold 28.25 billion won [13]. KDB's defense holds for its 400 million won and its 14 billion won as long as the fund terms say what KDB says they do [9][10]. Documents showing the bank suggested Hive Media or the film to its manager, or a fund set up with this target already named, would break it [4]. Neither bank disclosed the funds' sizes, its share of their capital, or the terms setting out what it could direct.
What to watch
- Whether Joo's call turns into a formal investigation that requests the documents of Company S and of the IBK-backed fund.
- Whether either bank discloses its share of the funds' capital or any rights over target selection written into the fund terms.
- Whether IBK says who decided the 14.25 billion won its backed fund put into Hive Media, separately from its direct stake.
Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence55
- Adoption
- Not scored
- Hype gap+25
- Incentives70
- Confidence60
Perspective Coverage
3 publishers- Builder
- Builder 5%
- Operator
- Operator 55%
- Investor
- Investor 40%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Industrial Bank of Korea and Korea Development Bank denied on Saturday that outside pressure influenced their investment in the film 'Assassin(s),' saying the decisions were made independently.
- [2]
IBK said the investment went through the same review process as other projects; a dedicated department evaluated the production company's capabilities, the strength of the director and cast, and the project's commercial prospects.
- [3]
"The allegation that the investment was decided at an outside request or through an abnormal process is not true," IBK said in a statement.
- [4]
KDB said the investor was a fund it had put capital into, not the bank itself, and that the fund's management company made the investment decision independently.
- [5]
"Decision-making and follow-up management on individual investments by a fund are the exclusive responsibility of the asset manager," KDB said.
- [6]
KDB stressed that "KDB cannot take part in the investment process."
- [7]
The manager of the KDB-backed fund that made the investment decision was identified as Company S.
- [8]
Rep. Joo Jin-woo of the People Power Party raised questions Tuesday over more than 30 billion won in investments by the state-run banks and funds in which they participated, calling for an investigation into whether political pressure had been involved.
- [9]
According to documents released by Joo, IBK invested 2 billion won directly in the film, while KDB invested 400 million won through a fund.
- [10]
An IBK-backed fund invested 14.25 billion won in Hive Media Corp., the film's production company, while a KDB-backed fund invested 14 billion won, according to the documents.
- [11]
Directed by Hur Jin-ho and released Sept. 23, the film depicts the 1974 assassination attempt on then-President Park Chung-hee in which first lady Yuk Young-soo was fatally shot; groups honoring Park and Yuk and the People Power Party have criticized the portrayal as distortion of history.
- [12]
The four investments in Joo's documents total 30.65 billion won.
- [13]
2.4 billion won (about 7.8%) went into the film; 28.25 billion won (about 92%) went into Hive Media Corp.
- [14]
Producer stakes are roughly 12 times the film stakes.
- [15]
IBK-linked investments total 16.25 billion won and KDB-linked investments total 14.4 billion won.
- [16]
IBK's direct 2 billion won is about 6.5% of the total; the 28.65 billion won routed through funds is about 93.5%.
Sources
3 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- en.sedaily.comState Banks Deny Outside Pressure in 'Assassins' Film Investment
1 article · October 2, 2026
- koreaherald.comState-run banks deny outside pressure over ‘Assassin(s)’ investment
1 article · October 3, 2026
- koreajoongangdaily.comState-run banks deny pressure to invest in controversial film ‘Assassin(s)’
1 article · October 3, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- South Korean state-run banks
Entities
- People Power Party
- Industrial Bank of Korea
- Korea Development Bank
- Hive Media Corp.