Skip to content

Product Independently confirmed2 publishers 3 min read Published

Meta blocked the search terms and left the videos up: nine takedowns from a list of 20-plus

Instagram removed nine of more than 20 flagged harassment clips, left near-identical ones live, and then Reels began serving the genre without being asked.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Adam Mosseri, who runs Instagram, said in mid-July that Meta would remove "harassing" pickup videos under its existing rules on bullying and harassment.
  • The genre involves a man wearing camera glasses approaching a woman in the street, delivering a line and filming her reaction without asking, with the clip posted to Instagram tagged as shot on Meta glasses; some have millions of views.
  • Business Insider's Katie Notopoulos spent the month after Mosseri's statement looking, found dozens of the videos still live including several from popular and verified accounts, and sent Meta a list of more than 20.
  • Meta took down nine of the more than 20 videos on the list Business Insider sent.
  • Meta actioned fewer than half of the flagged items: nine of a list of more than 20 is at most 45 percent.

Why it matters

Adam Mosseri said in mid-July that Instagram would remove "harassing" pickup videos filmed on Meta glasses under the platform's existing bullying and harassment rules [1] [2]. A month later, Business Insider's Katie Notopoulos sent Meta a list of more than 20 such videos still live, and the company took down nine [3] [4].

That ratio is the article. Fewer than half the items on a hand-delivered list from a reporter were actioned [12]. The most instructive removal, per Business Insider, involved a creator who had used the same line on several different women across several videos: Meta deleted the one on the list and left the others up [11]. That is not a policy being applied. That is a queue being cleared.

Meta is doing things. A spokesperson, Tracy Clayton, said thousands of pieces of content have been removed and several large accounts taken down [5]. Instagram now blocks searches for "rizz" and "cold approach", the slang terms for the genre [6]. Gizmodo, citing the same Business Insider reporting, noted that two popular accounts promoting pickup-artist content were removed last month [7]. But one large account deactivated in the first wave reappeared a few days later; Meta called that an error and re-banned it after Business Insider pointed it out [13]. A second account, with 174,000 followers, was deactivated the morning after it appeared on the reporter's list, appealed, and was back a day later with its videos restored [14]. Enforcement that depends on a journalist maintaining a spreadsheet is not enforcement.

Other platforms received the same material and did roughly the same thing. TikTok took down two of the four videos it was sent, citing bullying and sexual harassment [8]. YouTube removed several videos and pulled one channel from its monetisation programme [9].

The part that should worry anyone who ships a ranking model: Notopoulos reports that once she sought out and interacted with these videos, Reels began serving her more of them until her feed was almost entirely the genre [15]. Search terms stopped being necessary. Meta blocked the words and its own recommender restored the supply [16]. Moderation removes items; recommendation decides how many people see the ones that survive [17]. Blocking a query defeats deliberate hunting and does nothing to a model optimised for whatever holds attention [18].

Carolina Are, a digital criminologist at the London School of Economics, told Business Insider that Meta frames this as user behaviour or an enforcement error and does not acknowledge the systemic causes [19]. Four University of Sydney researchers, Joanne Gray, Milica Stilinovic, Marcus Carter and Ben Egliston, watched hundreds of the videos and published a preprint, "Harm Through the '#RizzCam': Smart Glasses, Ambient Capture and Invisible Harassment", reported by 404 Media on 12 August; it has not been peer reviewed [20] [21].

The commercial context explains why Mosseri delivered the message personally while his counterparts did not. Meta sells the camera and runs the feed [10]. Glasses sales topped 7 million units in 2025, more than triple the prior year, with Counterpoint Research putting Meta clearly ahead in smart glasses [22]. That makes them a rare bright spot in a Reality Labs division still losing money and cutting jobs this year [23], and Mark Zuckerberg has argued that people without AI glasses will be at a cognitive disadvantage [24]. A $2 sticker already defeated the recording light [25].

Watch whether Meta ever says anything about ranking rather than removal, whether reinstated accounts stay reinstated, and whether the peer-reviewed version of the Sydney paper quantifies distribution rather than volume.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence68
Adoption71
Hype gap+18
Incentives79
Confidence70
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Adam Mosseri, who runs Instagram, said in mid-July that Meta would remove "harassing" pickup videos under its existing rules on bullying and harassment.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    The genre involves a man wearing camera glasses approaching a woman in the street, delivering a line and filming her reaction without asking, with the clip posted to Instagram tagged as shot on Meta glasses; some have millions of views.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    Business Insider's Katie Notopoulos spent the month after Mosseri's statement looking, found dozens of the videos still live including several from popular and verified accounts, and sent Meta a list of more than 20.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    Meta took down nine of the more than 20 videos on the list Business Insider sent.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton said thousands of pieces of content have been removed and several large accounts taken down.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    Instagram now blocks searches for "rizz" and "cold approach", the slang terms for this content.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    Gizmodo, citing Business Insider, reported that two popular accounts promoting "pickup artist" content were removed last month.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  8. [8]

    TikTok took down two of the four videos it received, citing bullying and sexual harassment.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    YouTube removed several videos and pulled one channel from its monetisation programme.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    Mosseri personally delivered the message when counterparts at other platforms did not because Meta is on both sides: the glasses are its product and the feed is its product, with the harassment sitting between them.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    A creator had used the same line on several different women across several videos; Meta deleted the one on Business Insider's list and the others stayed up.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    Meta actioned fewer than half of the flagged items: nine of a list of more than 20 is at most 45 percent.

    Derived Supported
  13. [13]

    One large account deactivated in the first wave came back a few days later; Meta said that was an error and re-banned it once Business Insider pointed it out.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    Meta deactivated a second account with 174,000 followers the morning after it appeared on the reporter's list; its owner appealed and a day later it was back with videos restored.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  15. [15]

    Notopoulos reports that after she sought out and interacted with these videos, Reels began serving her more of them until her feed was filled almost entirely with the genre, and search terms stopped being necessary.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  16. [16]

    Meta has blocked the words people use to find this content and its recommendation system then finds it for them; both systems belong to the same company and are pulling in opposite directions.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  17. [17]

    Moderation removes items; recommendation decides how many people see the ones that remain.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  18. [18]

    Blocking a search term stops deliberate hunting but does nothing about a ranking model optimised for whatever holds attention, and this content evidently holds it.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  19. [19]

    Carolina Are, a digital criminologist at the London School of Economics, told Business Insider: "There is a backlash, and then Meta tends to minimize its own responsibility for it. They talk about how this is user-generated behavior or an error in enforcement... But they don't recognize the systemic issues that are causing that to happen."

    Reported Supported Source: Carolina Are, London School of Economics, via Business InsiderView cited source
  20. [20]

    Four researchers at the University of Sydney, Joanne Gray, Milica Stilinovic, Marcus Carter and Ben Egliston, watched hundreds of these videos and published a preprint titled "Harm Through the '#RizzCam': Smart Glasses, Ambient Capture and Invisible Harassment".

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  21. [21]

    404 Media reported the University of Sydney paper on 12 August; the work is a preprint and has not yet been peer reviewed.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  22. [22]

    Meta glasses sales topped 7 million units in 2025, more than triple the year before, and Counterpoint Research puts Meta clearly ahead in smart glasses.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  23. [23]

    The glasses are a rare success inside Reality Labs, which is still losing money and cut jobs this year.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  24. [24]

    Mark Zuckerberg has argued that people without AI glasses will end up at a cognitive disadvantage to those who have them.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  25. [25]

    A $2 sticker defeated the glasses' recording light.

    Reported SupportedView cited source

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. gizmodo.com

    1 article · August 17, 2026

    Instagram Is Still Drowned in Creepy Smart Glasses Content
  2. thenextweb.com

    1 article · August 17, 2026

    Instagram blocked the search terms. Its algorithm serves the videos anyway

Topics and entities

Topics

  • Platform Accountability
  • Content Moderation and Enforcement Asymmetry
  • Recommendation and Ranking Systems
  • Non-Consensual Capture and Harassment
  • Smart Glasses and Camera Wearables