Skip to content

Leadership Reports disagree10 publishers 2 min read Published Updated

GLM-5.2 completed a full replication chain on eight $55 TV boxes in four of five Anthropic runs

Anthropic researchers had GLM-5.2 complete a full replication chain on all eight $55 TV-box test nodes in four of five runs. They say no current model is both small and capable enough to spread in the wild, and that gap could close by the end of 2026 at the current pace.

The Engineer · Build desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying GLM-5.2 completed a full replication chain on eight $55 TV boxes in four of five Anthropic runs
Generated illustration
A 9B model set up AI on most device types tested Setup results from the researchers' tests: device types a 9-billion-parameter model handled, setup time on a new device, and RAM per TV box.

A 9-billion-parameter model set up an AI environment running Llama3.1-8B on 8 of 9 tested device types. Setup on a new device would take at least 28 hours and up to 150 hours, depending on the model. Each Android TV box in the Gemma4-26B-A4B test had 4 GB of RAM.

A 9B model set up AI on most device types tested
FigureValueNoteClaim
Device types where a 9B model set up Llama3.1-8B8 of 9 tested5
Hours to set up on a new device, at least28 hoursup to 150, depending on the model8
RAM per box, Gemma test4 GB2

What happened

  • The team deliberately left out the hacking step and tested the part it judged hardest: whether a model can set up a working AI environment on a device it has never seen.
  • A 9-billion-parameter model set up an environment running Llama3.1-8B on 8 of 9 tested device types, so individual steps are already within reach of small models.
  • In a separate test, Gemma4-26B-A4B was split by layers across 15 Android TV boxes with 4 GB of RAM each, and it ran slowly but worked.
  • The researchers estimate that a botnet the size of Kimwolf would hold compute equal to about 40 specialized AI chips and would have no central kill switch.

Why it matters

  • What's now possible capability A replicator can improve as it spreads. Passing notes between instances lifted Qwen3.5-9B by up to 39 percentage points, so first-generation success rates understate what later generations managed.
  • Who's exposed exposure Kimwolf worked only on specific device types. An AI botnet could run on all kinds of hardware, so the pool of reachable devices is every poorly secured connected device.
  • Who has to decide decision The researchers name ISPs, which could quarantine infected networks, and manufacturers, which could ban default passwords as the UK has by law. With no central kill switch, those are the points of control.

The 80% figure [19] measures a single stage. The chain has four: scan the network, gain access, set up the AI environment, spread from there [3]. Anthropic researchers William Zhou and Daniel Freeman [1] left the hacking step out and aimed the test at setup, which they judged the hardest part [4]. We think four of five is a best case for that stage and a poor guide to a live network.

For the number to transfer, the target devices would have to resemble the eight test nodes and the break-in would have to succeed first. It is also five runs. A third condition is hosting. A worm of this kind carries its model weights as part of the payload and runs inference on the compromised hardware [12]. The Decoder's report does not say where GLM-5.2's inference ran. The hardware it does describe is the Gemma rig: 15 boxes at $55 each, or $825 in total [13].

The timeline carries a condition. The Decoder frames the risk as months away [7]. The researchers' own date depends on small models continuing to improve at their current pace, and on one model becoming both small enough and capable enough. None is today [18].

Spread would be slow. Setup on a new device takes between 28 and 150 hours depending on the model [8], or about 1.2 to 6.25 days [14]. Kimwolf peaked above two million devices, mostly Android TV boxes [9]. Set against the researchers' 40-chip compute estimate for a botnet that size [10], that is more than 50,000 devices for each chip's worth of compute [15].

What to watch

  • A small model that completes the same chain on its own. The researchers say no current model clears both the size and the capability bar.
  • Results from a test that includes the break-in step, which this study left out on purpose.
  • Published details on GLM-5.2's size and where its inference ran in the eight-node runs.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence66
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+32
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence72

Perspective Coverage

11 publishers
Builder
Builder 34%
Operator
Operator 45%
Investor
Investor 21%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Anthropic researchers William Zhou and Daniel Freeman studied whether small AI models can spread on their own across poorly secured IoT devices such as smart TVs, smart refrigerators and robot vacuums.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    The researchers ran the Gemma4-26B-A4B model distributed across 15 off-the-shelf Android TV boxes, each costing about $55 and having 4 GB of RAM, with each box handling a portion of the model's layers; the model ran slowly but worked.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The researchers broke replication into four stages: scanning a network for vulnerable devices, gaining access, setting up the AI environment on the new device, and spreading further from there.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    The researchers deliberately left out the actual hacking step because earlier studies had shown small models can handle those attacks, and instead focused on the hardest part: whether a model can set up a working AI environment on a device it has never seen.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    A 9-billion-parameter model managed to set up an AI environment running Llama3.1-8B on 8 out of 9 tested device types.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    In a test of artificial evolution where each model instance passes notes on successful and failed strategies to its successors, Qwen3.5-9B's success rate climbed from 45 percent in the first generation to as high as 84 percent in later ones.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    The Decoder reports, citing the Anthropic study, that small AI models may be just months away from copying themselves across poorly secured consumer devices.

    Reported Supported Source: The Decoder, summarising the Anthropic studyView cited source
  8. [8]

    Setup on a new device would take between 28 and 150 hours depending on the model.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    The Kimwolf botnet, at its peak, infected more than two million devices, mostly Android TV boxes.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    The researchers estimate that in a botnet the size of Kimwolf the total compute would equal only about 40 specialized AI chips, and the network would have no central kill switch.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    Traditional botnets like Kimwolf only work on specific device types, while an AI botnet could run on all kinds of hardware.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    An AI worm would carry its model weights as part of the malware payload and run inference directly on the compromised hardware.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  13. [13]

    The 15-box Gemma rig cost about $825 in hardware.

    Derived Supported
  14. [14]

    Setup on a new device of 28 to 150 hours is about 1.2 to 6.25 days.

    Derived Supported
  15. [15]

    A Kimwolf-sized botnet of more than two million devices holding compute equal to about 40 specialized AI chips works out to more than 50,000 devices per chip's worth of compute.

    Derived Supported
  16. [16]

    Qwen3.5-9B's success rate rose by up to 39 percentage points between the first generation and the best later generations.

    Derived Supported
  17. [17]

    GLM-5.2 was the only model to complete the full replication chain reliably, infecting all eight test nodes in four out of five runs; the tests used off-the-shelf $55 TV boxes.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  18. [18]

    No current model is both small enough to run on consumer devices and capable enough to replicate itself; the researchers say that if small models keep improving at their current pace, they could get there by the end of 2026.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  19. [19]

    GLM-5.2's success rate in the full-chain test was 80 percent of runs.

    Derived Contested
  20. [20]

    ISPs could quarantine infected networks, as happened with the Mirai botnet, where 92 percent of infections were cleaned up within 14 days; manufacturers could shrink the pool of vulnerable devices by banning default passwords, as the UK has done by law; the report says defense needs coordination.

    Reported InsufficientView cited source

Sources

10 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. anthropic.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    Anthropic researchers say small AI models may be months away from being able to self-replicate on IoT devices like smart ovens and off-brand Android TV boxes
  2. businessinsider.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    AI worms and 'digital slime mold': Welcome to the next AI nightmare fuel
  3. cbsnews.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Anthropic warns "AI worms" could soon infect smart home devices
  4. dev.to

    2 articles · October 14, 2026

    Self-Replicating AI Experiment: Deploying to IoT Nodes via Unauthenticated ADB to Form Decentralized Inference
  5. kotaku.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Xbox Labs Is A Big Announcement About AI That's Missing The Word AI
  6. runtimewire.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Anthropic tests how AI models could spread across cheap home devices
  7. the-decoder.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Anthropic study warns that small AI models could soon replicate across everyday devices
  8. theguardian.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    AI in your oven? Anthropic warns models ‘months away’ from self-replication on smart devices
  9. theneuron.ai

    1 article · October 14, 2026

    The Next AI Cybersecurity Problem Could Run on Cheap TV Boxes
  10. thenewstack.io

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Anthropic’s red team ran AI on 15 cheap TV boxes. Then the math got unsettling.
  11. tomshardware.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Anthropic warns of self-replicating AI worm threat that doesn't need data centers to self-improve and spread

Topics and entities

Entities