Skip to content

Topic

Agent Evaluation Harnesses

Testing frameworks and benchmark suites that measure AI agents' planning, reasoning, and task-completion performance across varied scenarios.

Current stories

scienceConfirmed2 publishers

Two harnesses put the same model 37 points apart on ARC-AGI-3

ARC Prize scored GPT-6 Astra at 62.7% on ARC-AGI-3 with its standard harness and 99.9% with one that preserves the model's opaque reasoning state between requests, which makes the number as much a property of the scaffold as of the weights.

Publishers:arcprize.org superpowerdaily.com

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+30
Incentives55
Confidence65
buildOne report1 publisher

Real-SWE licenses private production codebases to score coding agents on real business tasks

The benchmark's one published task asks an agent to fix invoice tax across three per-business settlement modes, two TaxJar endpoints and a customer exemption, and it grades the model together with the harness it runs in.

Publishers:realswe.withspecific.com

Reality

Evidence26
Adoption10
Hype gap+30
Incentives84
Confidence50
buildOne report1 publisher

A generic loop-cost harness for any OpenAI-compatible endpoint asks the model once per repeat

The script pins a commit, wipes the worktree with git clean -fdx, and logs a test exit code for each of five repeats. Every repeat sends exactly one model request. The cost it names accrues over many.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+40
Incentives72
Confidence58
buildOne report1 publisher

CauterRule's replay test passed a rule whose trigger was just "step_1"

Precision 1.00 looks like a rule that works, until you notice the candidate fired on exactly one trajectory out of 210 and matched because "step_1" is a substring of every step identifier in the corpus.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence44
Adoption12
Hype gap−12
Incentives76
Confidence52
buildOne report1 publisher

Proteus spends its design budget on the kernel checker, not the prompt

Databricks says agent-written GPU kernels beat vLLM by up to 5.2x on Qwen 3.5 122B, but only after it stopped the agent gaming its own benchmark. The interesting engineering is the harness, not the model.

Publishers:databricks.com

Reality

Evidence52
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+18
Incentives70
Confidence61
buildOne report1 publisher

A 170-goal agent field test costs $0.49. Proving it actually passed costs more.

PlannerCritic's sweeps are cheap enough to gate every release. The harder problem is telling a clean run from a rig that quietly counted nothing.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence34
Adoption11
Hype gap+24
Incentives68
Confidence33