OpenAI lists GPT-6.1 Sol at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output; the 10-cent figure in early coverage is its cached-input rate. Teams moving work off Astra should budget on the list rates and OpenAI's per-task costs.
Perspective Coverage
5 publishers
- Builder
- Builder 44%
- Operator
- Operator 34%
- Investor
- Investor 22%
Reality
- Evidence50
- Adoption
- Not scored
- Hype gap+35
- Incentives70
- Confidence60
OpenAI's GPT-6.1 Sol price cut rewards teams whose agents resend the same long context
OpenAI's GPT-6.1 Sol halves cached-input pricing to $0.10 per million tokens and leaves standard rates at $2 and $10. Agents that resend long context collect the saving, while other buyers weigh gains shown mostly in OpenAI's own tests.
Reality
- Evidence55
- Adoption30
- Hype gap+20
- Incentives65
- Confidence55
Musk grades his unreleased Grok 4.7 against a superseded Anthropic model
Musk said the delayed Grok 4.7 should be roughly on par with Opus 5.0, not 5.1. Parity with what Anthropic and OpenAI already sell he put two versions further up the ladder, at Grok 4.9.
Reality
- Evidence26
- Adoption12
- Hype gap+42
- Incentives76
- Confidence36
buildOne report1 publisher Re-running five Terminal-Bench-Science tasks at $12 each leaves Fable 5.1 passing one
The published doubling was measured with a per-task allowance most teams will never grant, under a harness Anthropic has not described. The number that transfers is the one you get at your own spend cap.
Reality
- Evidence58
- Adoption22
- Hype gap+30
- Incentives60
- Confidence55
buildOne report1 publisher Fable 5.1 doubles science benchmark score, cuts bug-hunt task time by 3.6 seconds
Anthropic charges the same for 5.1 as it does for Fable 5, so the upgrade itself is free. Whether the Terminal-Bench-Science jump from 24.7% to 52.6% reaches your queue depends on how much work Fable 5 was already failing.
Reality
- Evidence44
- Adoption30
- Hype gap+40
- Incentives68
- Confidence55