Skip to content

Person

Matthew Elliott

Pro se plaintiff in a Connecticut case who embedded invisible prompt-injection text in his filings and lost electronic filing privileges as a sanction.

Known aliases

  • Elliott

Current stories

buildOne report1 publisher

Connecticut judge sanctions hidden prompt injection that no court AI was there to read

Judge Walter Spader Jr. found that no Connecticut court uses AI on filings, then sanctioned the litigant anyway. A clerk caught the size-3 white text by its spacing, not by scanning.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption18
Hype gap+12
Incentives42
Confidence40
productOne report1 publisher

A litigant hid AI instructions in a court filing. Your summarizer has the same problem.

A Connecticut judge found white-on-white instructions to AI models in a pro se motion, then found more in the reply. Any team summarizing text it did not author is handling adversarial input now.

Publishers:techdirt.com

Reality

Evidence66
Adoption24
Hype gap+18
Incentives30
Confidence61